Homeless DC Parents Fear Loss of Children … And They’re Right

By | May 24, 2012

Family with ChildI met a father at the Virginia Williams Family Resources Center, the District of Columbia’s central intake for homeless families. He was there with his wife and their baby and toddler because they were running out of money to pay for the motel room they’d been staying in.

He said he was afraid the children would be taken away from them. I asked him if anyone had told him that. Not exactly, but he was worried.

“We’re not bad parents,” he said. “We’re just down on our luck.”

He said it twice during our conversation. And I could see it was true from the way he was cuddling the baby.

I think of him now because the Family Resources Center has started reporting all homeless families with no place to stay to the Child and Family Services Agency, the District’s child welfare program.

This means that the parents can be charged with child neglect — and their children put into foster care — just because the District won’t provide them with shelter or other housing.

As the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless notes, they shouldn’t be. District law specifically states that “deprivation due to the lack of financial means … is not considered neglect.”

But that doesn’t mean homeless children won’t be taken from their parents.

As Professor Matthew Fraidin has written, we simply don’t know what goes on in the courtroom when parents are charged with neglect.

Judges are free to ignore the legal exemption for lack of financial means. And they may when they understand that the children have no safe place to stay — or decide that’s due to parental irresponsibility.

What we do know, from a recent report by the Citizens Review Panel, is that CFSA has taken many children from their parents without getting a court order first. And, in more than half the cases, the precipitous removals were not justified.

Also know, from CFSA’s own report, that “inadequate housing” was the primary reason it placed 35 children in foster care in 2010.

Are we to understand that parents with sufficient financial means deliberately chose unsafe housing — or no housing at all?

Rhetorical question. What the placements tell us is that homeless parents have good reason to fear that the powers-that-be will take their children away.

They certainly don’t have adequate housing, and CFSA has no resources of its own to provide it.

At the very least, families the Center reports are likely to be subject to intimidating investigations. Children may be interrogated. Imagine how frightening — even if nothing comes of it.

More likely, however, parents won’t ask for shelter when they’ve no place to stay if they’re told, as they are, that the Center will report their situation to the child welfare authorities.

This is already happening. Many Legal Clinic clients with nowhere to stay have left the Center for fear they’d lose their children, according to testimony by staff attorney Amber Harding.

Another client tells us that she stopped asking for shelter after Center staff repeatedly warned her that they’d have her kids removed if she couldn’t provide them with a safe place to sleep. “I won’t be calling again,” she says.

What the [expletive deleted] is the Department of Human Services doing?

Director David Berns, I’m told, claims that the department is just trying to do a better job of ensuring compliance with mandatory reporting requirements.

I don’t altogether buy this. Under District law, poverty and its immediate consequences, e.g. homelessness, don’t constitute abuse or neglect. So what’s to report?

“Safety risks,” Berns says. But there’s no mandate for reporting these unless they’re risks posed by abuse or neglect.

So we’ve got either an excess of zeal or a covert strategy for controlling the waiting list of homeless families the department can’t help — 308 of them, at last count.

I’d like to believe the former. But what I believe doesn’t matter.

What matters is that DHS doesn’t have the funds to protect all the families who’ve got no safe place to stay and instead is exposing children to all the risks that foster care entails.

Photo by Jackal of all trades.


  1. Posted May 24, 2012 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    This is unacceptable when families become homeless due to job loss , they have enough to worry about without having to worry that social services is going to swoop in and remove there children. If there was more resources to help parents before they become homeless it would be money better spent then taking children from their parents.

  2. SandyGreentree
    Posted May 24, 2012 at 8:25 pm | Permalink

    The system is broken. It needs to be fixed. Provide housing. This is a disgrace!

  3. jimm
    Posted May 24, 2012 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    Well, the younger ones can be sold for upwards of $30,000 each these days if they're white. It's called the American Adoption Industry and it isn't done for the benefit of the children, rather it's to fuel a largely unregulated $6 billion (in 2008) cash industry. Too many "social services" agencies are in cahoots with private adoption agencies and, until private adoptions are outlawed, baby-stealing will continue.

  4. Posted May 25, 2012 at 3:42 am | Permalink

    Thank you Jimm for writing TRUTH! Most Americans have NO CLUE about the horrendous consequences of Title IV-D funding! This provides every social service agency with bonuses of $4000-8000 for every child adopted from foster care. Many agencies have, for years, targeted POOR, WHITE families with pleasing to the eye, adoptable children, for their legalized child trafficking schemes. And we still want to believe that these agencies are in the business of "helping" families. So, many folks, with a concern about a child, pick up the phone and lodge an "anonymous" complaint about parents. Sure, there are some who really do need intervention, but the majority just need assistance, especially in regards to poor economic situations!
    DC is not the only city where this is taking place. I read from folks all over the US and UK who have been unjustly, ILLEGALLY (according to FEDERAL law) targeted, victimized and emotionally RAPED of their children by agencies, and corrupt court officials. It's about time for EVERY citizen to learn the TRUTH, become outraged and take a stand against these injustices and seek REDRESS from every elected official to put a STOP to this tyranny! For the sake of the children, families and their future, please don't stand by and ignore these situations, because your life is comfortable. It might be the poor first, but eventually, they can create a "reason" to come for you and your children!
    "First they came for the communists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
    Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
    Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me."
    YOU and your children could be next!

  5. Posted Sep 12, 2013 at 7:22 am | Permalink

    Providing them a home is not the solution. They need JOBS to have an income, so that they can provide their daily needs.

  6. Jamie
    Posted Jan 28, 2015 at 3:38 am | Permalink

    There is a lack of affordable housing in DC. These families not only need jobs that pay well, but they also need decent affordable housing. I am a sixth generation DC Washingtonian and my children are seventh generation Washingtonians. We are being pushed out of DC due to the lack of affordable housing. My father became a DC Fireman at the tender age of 21 and retired from the DC Fire Department at 50. My mother has worked at a hotel downtown since before I was born. I and my husband now face a situation where we might need to move out of DC. We are forced to live in an unsafe neighborhood for $1645 a month. We can't even allow our children to play outside. However, as this article addresses, we are the lucky ones. We were lucky enough to receive a DC housing voucher. But even with the voucher it is hard to find affordable housing in a safe neighborhood. We are victims of discrimination. Owners of homes that are in a safer neighborhood, who are renting their homes for an affordable price, refuse to rent to Section 8 Voucher participants (which is against the law). They have this biased view of Section 8 participants. It is as if they feel we will tear their house down and that we are too stupid, or lazy, to be good tenants, just because we are voucher recipients. Little do they know, my current landlord, of six years, has given me a glowing reference letter; I graduated magna cum laude from Trinity Washington University with my bachelors degree; I am currently working towards my Master of Arts in psychology at The Chicago School of Professional Psychology; and my husband is a apprentice at the Plumber's Local #5 Apprenticeship School with the Local 5 union. But we cannot find safe affordable housing. It's sad!

  7. Posted Jan 17, 2017 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    This one is really nice post

  8. Posted Jul 28, 2017 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

    Really interesting post thanks for sharing.